-
May 10, 2016 at 5:44 pm #128690Reply To: Join our online Q&A on exon skipping
Hi Emma, Prof Muntoni and Dr Kaye may be able to give you some information on recruitment plans for the upcoming trial
Hi Professor Muntoni, I saw your reply to Ms Calvert, our 5 year son has the same deletion requiring exon skipping 53. Would it be possible for him to be included in the Sarepta trials when they become available if we live in the UK?
Kind Regards
Muscular Dystrophy UK staff member
May 10, 2016 at 5:46 pm #128691Reply To: Join our online Q&A on exon skippingThe FDA were critical of methods used for biomarkers and clinical outcomes. How will future trials address these issues? Please see my previous post
In the process of developing a drug for a new disease indication such as muscular dystrophy, there are always challenges in developing surrogate and clinical endpoints. We are working on developing newer and more sensitive measures to measure dystrophin in muscle. We are also exploring new biomarkers that could be obtained from the serum or urine that would be easier for patients. We are looking at a number of exploratory clinical trial endpoints, but at present 6MWT remains the most reliable and validated clinical endpoint.
Dr Ed Kaye, CEO, Sarepta Therapeutics
May 10, 2016 at 5:46 pm #128692Reply To: Join our online Q&A on exon skippingHi
nice to hear from you.
This is a complex question and the space for a complex awser is not there!. Different studies have had different issues, one that is currently precluding the use of eteplirsen in Europe is one that I hope will be resolved this year. This is to do with a patent dispute that precludes the use of this drug in Europe although it was originally developed in Europe. Whether advocacy groups can influence the outcome of these disputes or not I dot frankly know.Professor Francesco Muntoni, Director, Dubowitz Neuromuscular Centre, Great Ormond Street Hospital
May 10, 2016 at 5:51 pm #128694Reply To: Join our online Q&A on exon skippingAs for Summit drug, this will need to be evaluated in the protocol when the protocol will be finalised. I am nto aware this has been finalised so far re: inclusion/ exlusion criteria
Professor Francesco Muntoni, Director, Dubowitz Neuromuscular Centre, Great Ormond Street Hospital
May 10, 2016 at 5:54 pm #128696Reply To: Join our online Q&A on exon skippingThanks to Professor Muntoni and Dr Kaye for all your answers so far. We have five more minutes if there are more questions!
Muscular Dystrophy UK staff member
May 10, 2016 at 5:54 pm #128697Reply To: Join our online Q&A on exon skippingAll children eligible for a clinical trial will be given consideration. There are issues regadring trial capacity at each of the trial sites, but as in UK we have recruited a number of exon 53 skippable children in the ongoing SKIP NMD, we should have the opportunity in the trail sites that will eventually open, to recruit new children not currently involved in exon 53 clinical trials
Professor Francesco Muntoni, Director, Dubowitz Neuromuscular Centre, Great Ormond Street Hospital
May 10, 2016 at 5:55 pm #128698Reply To: Join our online Q&A on exon skippingThe FDA were critical of methods used for biomarkers and clinical outcomes. How will future trials address these issues? Please see my previous post
In the process of developing a drug for a new disease indication such as muscular dystrophy, there are always challenges in developing surrogate and clinical endpoints. We are working on developing newer and more sensitive measures to measure dystrophin in muscle. We are also exploring new biomarkers that could be obtained from the serum or urine that would be easier for patients. We are looking at a number of exploratory clinical trial endpoints, but at present 6MWT remains the most reliable and validated clinical endpoint.
The FDA cited in the briefing document for Eteplirsen that “The lack of an effect with the higher dose group tends to undermine the finding in the lower dose group”. Is it possible that the lack of effect in the higher dose range could be attributed to an increased activation of endogenous miRNA pathways leading to post-transcriptional gene silencing? Is Sarepta currently investigating methods to mitigate RNAi pathways that may lead to an adjuvant therapy to increase exon skipping effectiveness?
Shouldn’t preliminary evidence indicating any increase (even 0.9%) in dystrophin be considered “substantial” over current therapies and therefore meet the threshold for breakthrough therapy designation under FDASIA?
At the present time, we don’t have a full understanding of the miRNA pathways that may be involved in the dystrophin gene pathway. Based on our pharmacodynamic assessment obtained through clinical trials, 30 mg/kg is the recommended dose.
While a minimal clinically threshold for dystrophin has not been established, we demonstrated a significant increase in dystrophin following treatment for at least 6 months. It will be determined by the FDA whether this meets guidelines established for regulatory approval.
Dr Ed Kaye, CEO, Sarepta Therapeutics
May 10, 2016 at 5:56 pm #128699Reply To: Join our online Q&A on exon skippingClaire O’Hanlon from Northern Ireland also had a second question for Sarepta:
What will the minimum age for eligibility for the exon 45 skipping trial in Europe? Most other exon skipping trials I’ve seen tend to have a minimum age of 6 or 7, will this still be the case or will accelerated approval of eteplirsen help in anyway to reduce the minimum age to 5?
May 10, 2016 at 5:57 pm #128700Reply To: Join our online Q&A on exon skippingIt was nice to “hear ” from you, From Ed, and also from all the families and also some DMD individuals. Have a good evening. Francesco Muntoni
Professor Francesco Muntoni, Director, Dubowitz Neuromuscular Centre, Great Ormond Street Hospital
May 10, 2016 at 5:58 pm #128701Reply To: Join our online Q&A on exon skippingClaire O’Hanlon from Northern Ireland also had a second question for Sarepta:
What will the minimum age for eligibility for the exon 45 skipping trial in Europe? Most other exon skipping trials I’ve seen tend to have a minimum age of 6 or 7, will this still be the case or will accelerated approval of eteplirsen help in anyway to reduce the minimum age to 5?
Minimum age is 6 years old for the exon 45/ 53 trial.
Dr Ed Kaye, CEO, Sarepta Therapeutics
May 10, 2016 at 6:00 pm #128704Reply To: Join our online Q&A on exon skippingIt was nice to “hear ” from you, From Ed, and also from all the families and also some DMD individuals. Have a good evening. Francesco Muntoni
We appreciate all the interest of the patient groups in exon skipping. We hope we were able to respond to your questions.
Have a very great evening!Dr Ed Kaye, CEO, Sarepta Therapeutics
May 10, 2016 at 6:02 pm #128705Reply To: Join our online Q&A on exon skippingThanks everyone for your questions, and to Professor Muntoni and to Dr Kaye for their time this evening.
We’ll be joined Professor Dame Kay Davies next week for a discussion on utrophin upregulation, so hope to see you there!
Muscular Dystrophy UK staff member
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.